ALERD: The new paradigm in dynamic customer surveying. Ask, Listen, Evaluate Response, Dialogue!

The common practice over the past few decades
Companies survey customer loyalty and/or customer satisfaction 1-2 times per year. Typically, companies respond to aggregated survey results after a two to three month delay - if at all - providing little or no real impact on the individual customer's experience and often, with little or no chance of fixing what might have been broken in their relationships with their unsatisfied customers.  Furthermore, because customers are approached weeks or months after the actual experience took place, many do not actually remember the specifics of the experience that they are being asked to evaluate, which in turn, seriously reduces the validity of the customer survey results.

This common practice represents a methodology which has been in use for, literally, decades. With customer satisfaction survey results and reports serving as a mere "historic matter of fact/matter of status," they obviously are not very actionable.

While you might like to think they are actionable, since you can probably identify areas of improvement, areas of opportunity, and customer preferences, you are not very likely to be able to leverage that type of traditional reporting to the individual customers' advantage - let alone use these survey results to work with and coach your Customer Service teams and other players acting as customer touch - points

If customer surveys are important to assess your customers’ loyalty and/or customer satisfaction, consider your next steps

My take on this is:
Traditional, periodic measuring and reporting techniques on key performance indicators that relate to customer loyalty, customer satisfaction and the overall customer experience are not advantageous when compared to new alternatives. Not only do they lag behind crucial timeframes required for a response (the time between when you ask the questions to the time that you are able to react to the actual data), but also due to the accumulated nature of reporting data. More often than not, companies survey their customers months after the actual experience took place. 

So, in order to get ahead, you need to consider these two steps:

Future practices already implemented by a few highly - professional players
Companies want to survey customers experiences, loyalty, satisfaction and preferences LIVE to be able to immediately respond to them in a meaningful way. In doing so, they gradually build a practice that provides relevant and loyalty - building answers to customers’ survey responses as well as being able to immediately correct and/or improve customer experience right in the Customer Service Center and at all other customer touch points.

While most executives and marketers at management level agree that the customer experience is the area that concerns them the most, very few have taken concrete steps to proactively correct or improve the customer experience.  Many will admit that the current measurement practice is outdated and that there is a real need to apply a more dynamic (live) concept to the measuring of customer loyalty, customer satisfaction, and campaign effectiveness when respondents interact with company touch points as well as improving the overall customer experience.

What marketers need to consider - Step 1
The current trend is that leading companies across many industries want to measure the customer experience (and customer satisfaction/ customer loyalty) in REAL TIME. In other words, companies understand the importance of being able to hear about customers’ experience within minutes or hours of their experience rather than the more common practice which causes a significant delay of weeks or even months.

Regardless of your industry, if you currently have more than twenty thousand customers, you need to realize the importance of understanding how well your company meets the expectations of your customers.  And you must measure your customers more frequently; one or two sampling based surveys, per year, simply does not do the job.

Companies need to be able to monitor their own performance, if not monthly, then at least quarterly. Moreover, companies need actionable output to coach their employees who are working on the phones, at answering email, chat boxes, or through any other customer touch points.